logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#91677 03/30/17 11:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
OP Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
I'm having an issue with my stock '69 C10. Since I've owned it it never idled right but beyond that it ran good but rich. A few weeks ago I swapped out the stock MV for a 250 MV. It runs much better but it seems to also run lean. I can leave the choke partially engaged and the engine performs better than with the choke off. I know I'm running a smaller carb but I'm surprised there would be that much of a difference. Thoughts?


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
I
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
I
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
The 250 carb is jetted leaner because of emissions. If you don't have a vacuum leak see what the jet size and rod size are on both carbs. Maybe some combination of the 2 would work? Jay

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
OP Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
I'll look into that. Thanks Jay.


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
OP Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
What other carb options have been proven effective for normal street driving?


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
I
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
I
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
If you don't want to change the intake manifold, a model B Rochester is possible. There are/were kits from landgons I believe that used a weber 32/36 carb. With a 292 if I were going that route I would upgrade to thr 38/38 carb. Another possibility would be a small base 2gc rochester. That carb, along with the adapter required, comes out about the same height as the Monojet. The small base 2gc also uses the same size hole for the air cleaner so the stock unit would fit on the carb. Any solution I mentioned other than the B carb would need an adapter to fit the stock manifold. Jay

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
OP Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
What size primary am I looking for on the 2GCs?


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
I
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
I
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
I am not a 2gc expert by any means. This is what I know. Depending on which mono jet came on your 292 it would be either 250 or 210 cfm according to Doug Roe's book. There is supposed to be 2 sizes of the small base 2gc that has the same size hole as your stock air cleaner. One has1 3/32 Venturi and 278 cfm. One has1 7/32 venturi and is 320 cfm. I have never seen the 7/32 version, but that doesn't mean they exist. Both carbs have a 1 and 7/16 throttle blades.
There are 5 sizes of the Large Base 2gc carb. One has 1-3/32 Venturi and 1-7/16 throttle blades just like the small base carb. I didn't know such a carb existed til I measured one of the carbs in the garage.
The other 4 large base carbs have 1 11/16 throttle blades.
The Venturi sizes are 1-3/16, 1-1/4, 1-5/16 and 1-3/8.
If I were trying to run the stock air cleaner I'd go with a small base, the bigger Venturi if I could find it. This assumes that you have the stock cam. I DO NOT know if the linkage ect will clear your air cleaner might want to try a test fit before purchase. Some early small base carbs have a high mounted choke coil might not clear the carb.
If I were going with a Large Base carb on a stock 292 I'd go with a 1-1/4 or maybe a 1-5/16 Venturi model knowing that the stock air cleaner won't fit. The bigger the Venturi the more sluggish the low end will be with some improvement in top end. I hope that others that know more than me will chime in. Jay

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
OP Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Thanks for you advice, Jay. Hopefully I can also get better gas mileage out of my 292.


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
I
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
I
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 482
Strummin 67, please take a little time to educate me.i have heard that 292 engines are gas hogs, that guys with a 305 V8s do better on gas. Is this true? Could it be a 292 is usually in a truck with steep gears like 4.11? I have thought about putting a 292 in a 77-79 full size Chevy. I think the stock 2.41/2.56 gears would work well with the 292s low speed torque. Jay

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
OP Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Hi Jay.
The 292 I have is in a '69 pickup. I believe the gears are 3:73s but I'm not 100%. I get decent mileage as long as I stay off of the freeway and even then I'm usually driving about 55mph.


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10

Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 384 guests, and 47 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony, KeithB, Steve83
6,783 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5