logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#51104 07/09/09 08:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Question here. I have a 230 from a '69 Camaro. It seems that the 230 is an under-dog here. I seldom see any posts regarding a 230. I would like to do a split exhaust, perhaps even a dual intake someday. Rare to find any discussions on these topics for a 230. And parts??? Good luck huh? I am putting a T-5 from a Chevy S-10 behind it and then to a rear from an S-10 4x4 truck. All this parked in an Essex Coupe from 1929. Looonnngg way to go still, but it looks like a car now! Thanks. Perley


Every purchase has it's price!

Smile - It makes people wonder what you are thinking!

Perley
oldrodder43 #51105 07/09/09 09:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 114
V
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
V
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 114
I think highly of the 230, If you read my posts you'll see I have a 66 Chevelle with a 230. I'm also building a a 69 Camaro with a 230 for NHRA Stock Class Drag Racing.

VStock #51106 07/09/09 11:03 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
S
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
Me too. I've a 230 build planned but not yet executed with a forged crank in a '64 block, TRW flat tops, and Crower rods. I say planned because I've got the parts but homeowner projects have temporarily taken priority. Vehicle is a '72 Nova.

oldrodder43 #51107 07/09/09 11:12 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 79
K
Active BB Member
Offline
Active BB Member
K
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 79
Oldrodder, any recommendations made regarding the 250 also apply to the 230. In the late 70's there was a class of modifieds that ran six cylinder engines; we sometimes ran the 230 in the lighter cars due to the shorter stroke (3.25 vs 3.53). Induction was limited to a single two barrel so the volumetric efficiency was better with the 230 at higher rpm. I liked the flat top piston combination; it appeared to have better flame travel when used with the 194 head. The 305 1.84 intake valve is an easy installation or you can turn 1.94's back to a 1.875; I never liked the 1.94 in the 230 but some guys ran them. They are still a viable engine choice, just keep in mind that they have less low end torque than the 250 so "cam" accordingly for the street........fats


fats
oldrodder43 #51143 07/11/09 01:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
D
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
D
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
Since your Essex will likely weigh about the same as an early Nova (2800 lb or so with a 194/230/250) and you have the T5 for takeoff, the missing low end from the 230 vs the 250 shouldn't matter as much.

Maybe since the Essex came with a six, people will think it's the original engine!

DeuceCoupe #51158 07/11/09 09:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Thanks very kindly for the responses. I think the 230 and the T-5 are going to be a great combination, if and when I get it on the road. Progress is slow on it. The motor supposedly came from a '69 Camaro and had an automatic behind it. I've had a devil of a job finding parts, flywheel, pressure plate, especially a clutch. I finally had to have the people of Ft. Wayne Clutch build one. Perley


Every purchase has it's price!

Smile - It makes people wonder what you are thinking!

Perley

Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (Beater of the Pack), 165 guests, and 251 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
FlintMich, Oblithian, joelortiz64, Dewey, 69BlazerBlake
6,909 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5