|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 229
Contributor
|
OP
Contributor
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 229 |
Has anyone had any luck getting heads(GMC in this case) checked for cracks this way? How much is charged for the service? Thanks,
Ed Pruss Longmont, CO
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191 |
I have never had it done but I know it is not very expensive. The local shop out here charges about $20 to $30 per head for the V-things.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 33
Active BB Member
|
Active BB Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 33 |
Just picked up a "848" head and they did a magnaflux check for $30.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
1000 Post Club
|
1000 Post Club
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332 |
Dear Ed; Yes; The Magnaflux process is a standard part of rebuilding heads & almost all automotive Machine Shops have the equipment. If your working on a head your familar with then It's not necessary. Good luck. 
John M., I.I. #3370
"There are no shortcuts to any place worth going". -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 214
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 214 |
a mag. test is not as good as you think. a pressure test would be better.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232 |
Hello Bob,
I assume you must have had a bad experience with mag particle testing results. Would you please elaborate on your reservations of the mag particle test. With fluorescent dye, a UV lamp, and a qualified tech its should be very effective.
Also inexpensive dye penetrant tests kits (cleaner, red dye, and, white powder developer) available from your local welding or industrial supply are much better than a unaided visually inspection. Dye penetrant testing is considered less effective than the mag particle testing by industry.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,622 Likes: 25
1000 Post Club
|
1000 Post Club
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,622 Likes: 25 |
A mag test will not tell you if you have a internal LEAK.It will only show a surface issue. This is why a pressure test is better.
Larry/Twisted6 [oooooo]  Adding CFM adds boost  God doesn't like ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232 |
Larry,
Are you pressurizing the coolant passages to detect cracks/leaks in one of the internal head passages? Makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,622 Likes: 25
1000 Post Club
|
1000 Post Club
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,622 Likes: 25 |
Tested right from The Thermo housing Mount. This will also tell you if you have seats installed and there is any Leaks around the seat area as well. Pressure Or Vacum Is much the same Test. But a simple answer is YES This is how I found out a had a very small Leak Under one of my exhaust seats. (#1 for that matter)
Larry/Twisted6 [oooooo]  Adding CFM adds boost  God doesn't like ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810 Likes: 1
1000 Post Club
|
1000 Post Club
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810 Likes: 1 |
After my experience with a porus casting earlier this year, from now on I'll always get a used head pressure tested before I get it rebuilt.
51 GMC 4.2 turbo Can't solved today's problems using the same technology/thinking that created them
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 214
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 214 |
larry and efi-diy have answered the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232 |
Thanks for the replies guys. Those are good examples of the limitations of mag particle testing.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 179
Contributor
|
Contributor
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 179 |
Good stuff.Guess I better have my head tested.
|
|
|
|
1 members (stock49),
6,104
guests, and
89
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|