logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
J
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
J
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
I think I found the correct cam journal diameter which is 1.8682 - 1.8692. (I don't have the Santucci book with me.) Am I correct in calculating potential cam base circle where the lobe lift is subtracted from journal diameter? The cam's base circle cannot be any larger than this. That would be the maximum base circle allowed correct?

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
S
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
Journal minus twice the lift is max base circle.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
J
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
J
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
Thanks. So 1.868 minus .700 nets me 1.168. Lobe lift is actually .343 for exhaust, I just used .350. Is that a little too large for base circle diameter? How much room do I need as that would be maximum amount of base circle?

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
S
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
I think you just need to be able to assemble into the block. I'm not aware of any other limitations. There may be some issues with lifter position relative to oiling passage and lifter bores but I don't know about that.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
J
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
J
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
Okay thanks. I know that a larger base circle will be better in general as it helps the lobe profile with ability for ramp rates, area under the curve etc. I'll have to talk to the engine builder to see what would be do able. I know the numbers work in theory. I just don't know how much room would be ideal to help in assembly.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
J
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
J
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
Now I'm second guessing myself on the cam journal size. Can someone confirm that 1.868 is the correct cam journal size for the 250-292 Chevy engine family? Thanks!

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
D
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
D
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
1.8687" is what my 62 book shows.
Along with a .1914" lobe lift for a smoooooooth idle.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
J
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
J
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 80
Thanks! That's right in the middle of the range of tolerances I found on the web.


Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 20 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Ehb86, OldFord777, Drachenblut, SSG Pohlman, castironphil
6,789 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5