logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
D
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
D
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
When presented with the aluring prospect of using my OFFY triple carb intake with 2 barrel adapters and three carter webers, or the second idea of using a clifford four barrel intake with like a 500 CFM edelbrock, I wont use a holley...I cant bring myself to do it. Anyway, what do you guys think would be better for HP, and torque, and gas mileage, and throttle response. I have heard that 4 barrels are not as good because the carb is farther from the end-ports, and fuel distribution is not as good, supposidly it runs like 15% leaner on the ends, and that the triple corrects this, and is better for all around driveability. Thoughts anyone? by the way I will be using this on a future caddy 261 totaling 285-290 cubic inches, with highly ported/polished cylinder head, clifford hearders, clifford 270 degree cam, .470 lift with high lift intake rockers, enlarged intake/exhaust valves, all balanced with HEI and like 9-1 or 10-1 compression and a 5 speed.


you can lead people to truth, but you can't make them see it!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
D
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
D
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
If you run syncronized linkage to all 3 2 barrels it will require plenty of carb tuning and still it might not have the street manners your after.(3 2 barrels is alot of carburation)Alot of guys use progressive linkage and run just on the center carb at cruise. The four barrel would likely be the most practical. I personaly like the look of a few rochester singles on that manifold. \:D

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
D
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
D
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
yeah singles are a possibility, but i have seen people here use trip carter weber progressive 2 barrels with much sucess on standard 235 's, im talking about the carter's that tom langdon sells. thoughts anyone?


you can lead people to truth, but you can't make them see it!
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
D
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
D
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
yeah singles are a possibility, but i have seen people here use trip carter weber progressive 2 barrels with much sucess on standard 235 's, im talking about the carter's that tom langdon sells. thoughts anyone?


you can lead people to truth, but you can't make them see it!
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 540
T
Major Contributor
*****
Offline
Major Contributor
*****
T
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 540
There's a guy I met at an Inliner's met from Ohio a few year back,he runs 3 of those Holley-Webers carbs on a modified 261.I never rode in his car,but the guy is very knowledeable and drives long distances in the vehicle.
In my opinion,the central located 4bbl creating a lean mixture on the end cylinders is not necessarily true.I've run a 4bbl on a 261 for many years and now on a 302 GMC for several years.On both engines,there is no indication of a mixture problem.I'm not saying the 4bbl is the ultimate set up,2 or 3 carbs is probably better in some situations,but on a street engine,the 4bbl will function just fine if it's tuned properly.
On my 302 GMC I run a rather small 390 cfm Holley 4bbl.This engine has a cam ,headers,actual 9.5 compression Venolia pistons,small block Chevy V-8 valves and other modifications.The head is not really ported however.For street driving,the small carb seems to giver better response and power up to 4500 rpm.This engine makes an estimated 230-240 hp.The stock 302 head is supposed to have better breathing than a ported 235-261 head,so don't be afraid to run a small carb or carbs,in my opinion anyway.


70 Triumph 650 cc ECTA current record holder
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
J
1000 Post Club
*****
Offline
1000 Post Club
*****
J
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
Dear Mr. Dbane;

The 3 pot manifold with 2bbl adapters is a good idea. I've not done it, but plan to on my 278". As mentioned; there's constant adjustment on the linkage if you "stab it" often, but thats Hot Rod life. \:D

The Clifford with a 390 CFM Holly is good too as you avoid all that adjustment (saving fuel) & only lose a little power.

With $3.00 a gallon gas It's a "toss up". The single 4bbl is probably the cheaper (purchase/operating) choice, all things considered.

How you plan to drive it will be the determining factor I feel.

BTW: Manifold vacuum is equal throughout making the 15% lean (end cyl) a myth.

Good luck. \:\)


John M., I.I. #3370

"There are no shortcuts to any place worth going". -Anon
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 299
C
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
C
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 299
I got two HWs on a dual Offy and it`s a pain in the a... to keep em syncron.

The Clifford intake with the wide open plenum will distribute more evenly than 2 or 3 carbs that are constantly going out of tune.

Talk to clifford what carb they recomend for your Clifford cam.

just my ct 2, Frank


To old to die young.
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 542
D
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
D
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 542
dbane,

i've got two CARTER/webbers, that i bought from tom langdon, on a 181 ci mercruiser 4-banger. the engine is in my Model A and has a 4-speed behind it. for my money, those carbs are one of the best investments i ever made.....right out of the box, they ran perfect on my homemade, water-heated intake. it'll start no matter how cold, or hot, is very responsive and i think i get excellent mileage, considering i've got quite a bit of work done to the engine. i don't see why 3 of them wouldn't work as nicely on your six........


Lord, let me live long enough to do all the projects I have planned!
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 289
J
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
J
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 289
I use a single 4/barrel on my racing 311" GMC. Technically the GMC and Chevrolets 6's are an odd fire if you count the pulses between the shared intake ports.

The real key to a good running engine with any of the combinations using carbs is a good consistant vacuum signal. I set quite a few records with a single Braswell 2 barrel which flowed over 700 cfm on a tube manifold which was not same length to all ports. I went to the 4/barrel when I figured out how to use a 292 Clifford manifold on a GMC 270 "H" head.

The additional venturis mixed fuel better and the factory taper of the Clifford increased the port velocity at the valve so I made more power. Next I will trying a Precision Engineering hi-rise manifold off a 292 as soon as I'm done with work..

The other key is to warm the manifold by using exhaust or water..Good Luck..#35


216.158 MPH 12-Port 302 GMC on 70% 171.0 MPH 302 stock head on gasoline 7 years later
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 136
5
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
5
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 136
If you order your multiple carter/webers from Langdon tell him what they are for and he will jet them right. They are progressive carbs so you can run straight linkage. Last I knew the electric choke model cost around $80.00 each new. Can't get a good performance 4 bbl for that! Four bbls are like Cheby 350 motors, everybody has one.

They are around 230 cfm each. With your motor specs I think a carter/weber tripower would work fine and get respectable milage(as good/better as any 4 bbl). I have the carter/webers for my 225 ci motor.


1951 Ply Concord truck
1954 Nash Rambler 2 dr
1955 Nash Rambler Farina
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
J
1000 Post Club
*****
Offline
1000 Post Club
*****
J
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
Well It's a "toss up" with good arguements on both sides.

Those 'modern' 2bbl carbs look like a good deal, running progressive etc.

Is that slant 6 going into the 51??


John M., I.I. #3370

"There are no shortcuts to any place worth going". -Anon
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 136
5
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
5
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 136
John, the slant will be in the 51 Ply truck along with a T5 5 speed.


1951 Ply Concord truck
1954 Nash Rambler 2 dr
1955 Nash Rambler Farina
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
J
1000 Post Club
*****
Offline
1000 Post Club
*****
J
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
That sounds like a good place/combo.

Keep the other one stock like you made it.

You'll have to post some pics when done.


John M., I.I. #3370

"There are no shortcuts to any place worth going". -Anon

Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 18 guests, and 29 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Ehb86, OldFord777, Drachenblut, SSG Pohlman, castironphil
6,789 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5