logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#14217 02/08/07 11:11 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
B
Major Contributor
***
OP Offline
Major Contributor
***
B
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
Guys,
I have never played with turbos, except on diesels, What would be the lowest comp ratio that it would be adviseable to start with and would a lower comp ratio (5 or 6 to 1 or) with more boost make more power? As it does with a roots type blower. Also would there be an advantage to multiple small turbos over one or two larger ones.
Pros, Cons, opinions?

Just idle thoughts on a sub zero morning.

Maybe this should be in a different section of the B board like performance or bench racing but I wanted everybodies thoughts.


Been there, Done that, Hope to live long enough to do it again.
Big Bill
I.I.# 4698
#14218 02/08/07 02:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 460
I
Contributor
****
Offline
Contributor
****
I
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 460
Whats the intended use of the engine or are you just asking?


More boost ~ less compression


One or two turbos? Get ready for opinions. \:\)

#14219 02/08/07 05:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,556
Likes: 35
1000 Post Club
****
Offline
1000 Post Club
****
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,556
Likes: 35
i,d say start with atleast 8 to 1 comp. any lower and the engine will be a turd. higher than 9.5 and you will be boost limited by fuel very quickly. i presently have my engine around 8.25 and have run the boost safely to 12 with 91 octane. also using a intercooler. i also run 1 turbo. it simplifies the install. some will say 2 turbos spool faster, but i have found that if set up correct 1 turbo spools plenty fast. especially on our relatively small cube motors. tom


Inliner Member 1716
65 Chevelle Wagon and 41 Hudson Pickup
Information and parts www.12bolt.com

#14220 02/08/07 06:18 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
B
Major Contributor
***
OP Offline
Major Contributor
***
B
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
Inline 300

Just me thinking. I am building a roadster for a gentleman with a 2000cc four in it and we were talking about what could be done to make it eat medium V8s. That got me to thinking and you know where that will take a person. I got to thinking about small turbos like for motorcycles and then started to wonder if special pistons were made to lower compression ratio and a large cooler was installed, what could a person come up with. I was thinking small turbos would spool up faster to help off set the power loss at low rpms due to lower comp.ratio. Don't know if any of this would work or not so am asking for opinons or experence if anyone has ever tried it.


Been there, Done that, Hope to live long enough to do it again.
Big Bill
I.I.# 4698
#14221 02/08/07 10:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,839
Likes: 1
M
1000 Post Club
***
Offline
1000 Post Club
***
M
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,839
Likes: 1
First off, you do not want to use a turbo sized for a motorcycle, too small.

Now a days ,turbos can spool almost as fast as you want to.
Selecting the correct turbine housing, ball bearing center sections all affect turbo spool up time.

Reason factory cars run about 8.25- 8.5 to 1 compression is because it is made for the general public. The intercoolers are all too small, turbine housings ,too small, all add up to higher intake temps. which in turn you need to keep your boost lower.
My Syclone pick up truck ran 14 lbs of boost pressure stock. 8.3 to 1 approx.
I now can run 22-24 psi boost pressure w/the help of methanol injection. Aquamist 1S system.

Best thing you can add (Methanol injection) to your turbo application to supress detonation & up the boost period!

People are leaning towards 9 to 1 compression lately.
If you get the correct combination you can run 8.5 to 9.0 to 1 compression & run anywhere from 12 - 26 lbs of boost pressure on 91-93 octane gas
w/added methanol injection, no problem.

MBHD


12 port SDS EFI
#14222 02/08/07 10:33 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
B
Major Contributor
***
OP Offline
Major Contributor
***
B
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
MBHD
I was thinking on the 2000cc engine that twin small turbos would work, don't know. I know on our chy.hemi we ran 5 to 1 with 30 lbs boost when we hit the traps, but we used a teflon sealed roots type blower. This allowed much more power than when we had 8.5 to 1 CR. I don't know if a turbo will respond in the same manner or not. I am thinking of a large cooler. I would like to run this engine on prem fuel but no Methanol. I want this vehicle to be user friendly and I can see it running out of methanol and trashing itself. These are things you have to consider when you build for other people. By the way it has a 5 speed so it isn't limited by a stall speed.


Been there, Done that, Hope to live long enough to do it again.
Big Bill
I.I.# 4698
#14223 02/08/07 11:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 460
I
Contributor
****
Offline
Contributor
****
I
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 460
cool big bill, sounds like a cool project.


as far as, single or dual turbos, ideally, you go with a turbo thats application speicific, then it will do what you want it to do, it takes a little to understand turbo sizing or it did for me.


a good internet source to learn about turbos would be I believe "turbomustangs.com", look in the knowledge base, alotta information, it began as a mustang site but they have other make sections, shouldnt be hard to find something on a turbo 2.3. there are a few good books out there as well. Is this a ford 2.3 your talking about? They can be impressive under boost.

 Quote:
By the way it has a 5 speed so it isn't limited by a stall speed.
you want a load on the engine to spool up the turbos.

I wanna see pix of this roadster build up. \:\)


good luck

#14224 02/08/07 11:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
D
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
D
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
As far as I can tell the jury is still out on twin turbo's vs a single turbo, I think one properly sized turbo might be best, it's less money, less plumbing, less weight ect..

Most high perf VW(air cooled)engines are around 2000cc and there are alot of turbo kits avaliable for them. Just a thought...

Dan


Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 364 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony, KeithB, Steve83
6,783 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5