logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#3651 05/08/04 08:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31
S
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
S
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31
hello, has anyone tried putting a 292 crank in the small blocks (194 230 250). i read on cliffords site the crank fits, then you reuse the old rods, but i'm not sure about pistons. i'm really intersted in doing this 'cause i'm limited by hood clearance in my imapla and 4000 lbs W/ 308's and a 230 doesn't cut it.
thanks for any advice Matt

#3652 05/08/04 08:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
J
1000 Post Club
*****
Offline
1000 Post Club
*****
J
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,332
Dear Matt;

I would check with Larry(twisted 6)as he is 'on top'of all that stuff.

John m.....


John M., I.I. #3370

"There are no shortcuts to any place worth going". -Anon
#3653 05/09/04 05:58 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 315
'
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
'
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 315
Didn't they used to call that a "Cheater 292"? Not sure why.


I/I #4101
'71 GMC Jimmy 350, sm465, np205,3.73 posi.
'68 C/10 Stepside 292 (.030 over) Offy Intake, 500 CFM AFB,Clif headers, sm465, 3.73 posi.
'67 K/10 454 project.
'72 K/5 rolling frame project.
#3654 05/09/04 01:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 300
M
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
M
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 300
 Quote:
Originally posted by '68OrangeSunshine:
Didn't they used to call that a "Cheater 292"? Not sure why.
I would guess it would really be more of a "cheater 250" (or "cheater 230", etc.).It's a cheater because it looks like the authentic thing but has the crankshaft (therefore overall displacement) of the bigger six.

There have been several discussions of this on this board - do a search of this topic in the "Engine", "Drivetrain" & "High Performance" forums and you'll find matches for sure.

The main problem I remember from previous posts is engine failure due to the long stroke of the crank & long rods in the short deck block. And there has to be extensive block modifications and bottom end balancing to reduce the chances of failure. Twisted 6 & other more experienced inline 6 builders would be the ones to best advise on this topic.

-magic mike-

#3655 05/10/04 05:29 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 315
'
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
'
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 315
Thanks Mike. That clears that up. Not that I'm accusing anyone of cheating.


I/I #4101
'71 GMC Jimmy 350, sm465, np205,3.73 posi.
'68 C/10 Stepside 292 (.030 over) Offy Intake, 500 CFM AFB,Clif headers, sm465, 3.73 posi.
'67 K/10 454 project.
'72 K/5 rolling frame project.
#3656 05/10/04 12:04 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 19
1000 Post Club
**
Offline
1000 Post Club
**
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 19
Useing a 292 crank In a 230,250 block You end up a with low deck/sb 292. the last pricing I had on something like this was around a grand for a crank & pistons. weights have to be cut down and special ordered pistons are needed. And some feel/say That the crank wants to push every thing out the side of the block due to the crank stroke.I would have thought the 292 would fit in that impala Your only talking a 1 1/2 taller motor. What are you plains? for this car.}[oooooo]


Larry/Twisted6
[oooooo] smile
Adding CFM adds boost smile
shocked God doesn't like ugly.
#3657 05/10/04 03:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 255
S
Contributor
****
Offline
Contributor
****
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 255
hey, i have a 250 in my truck right now. if i'm right...i can put a 292 cam into it, and..it would work? lol. from the sounds of it (please excuse my vague-ness on this) a 292 crank in a 250, you need to have new rods and pistons? just checking...because i have an extra 292, and was wondering if it would be any better mods.

thanx, SamWise


1967 Chevy II, 2-door post.
250, 3-OTT.

1969 GMC 1/2-ton.
307, 3-OTT.
DD.
#3658 05/10/04 04:27 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 680
B
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 680
If you are planning on using a mechanical fuel pump, you cannot use a 292 cam in a 250. The pump lobes are in different locations. With an electric fuel pump, you can use the cam, but may need to remove or machine the lobe to get clearance.


Inliner #1916
#3659 05/10/04 10:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31
S
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
S
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 31
alright, you guys talked me out of it, i just did't want to buy a new cam and pushrods, but itlooks like i'll uee an electric fuel pump to keep the cam and buy a shorter air cleaner. so far it's a 270 crane cam rhodes lifters roller rockers stovebolt exhaust manifold and a 390 holly on a clifford intake. i just hope the 292 will spin as fast as my 230, it's fun...

#3660 05/11/04 03:08 AM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 19
1000 Post Club
**
Offline
1000 Post Club
**
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 19
one other note here guys on the Cam issue If a cam is made for a 292 It will seem Bigger in a 250. and a cam made for a 250 will seem/act smaller in the 292. What do you mean by as fast? Slow65. As in High RPMs? }[oooooo]


Larry/Twisted6
[oooooo] smile
Adding CFM adds boost smile
shocked God doesn't like ugly.

Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 130 guests, and 48 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony, KeithB, Steve83
6,783 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5