#45078 - 11/11/08 06:37 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: inline300]
|
jlgrooms
Active BB Member
 
Registered: 05/21/04
Posts: 99
Loc: West Tennessee/Kentucky
|
James: If you do a search for "forced induction" threads for "supercharged 250" beginning 5/16/08, you should find a record of my experience "rootin'" an inliner. Got about 6000 trouble free miles on her now and lovin it! But it's a street rod, not a racer. Be happy to help any way i can, including drawings of the manifold, pulley ratios, timing tips, etc.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45124 - 11/13/08 06:33 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Freds Garage]
|
jlgrooms
Active BB Member
 
Registered: 05/21/04
Posts: 99
Loc: West Tennessee/Kentucky
|
Pappy (jlgrooms) I absolutely LOVE that Supercharger set up. Very very clean, you definetly have skills I can only imagine. So I will log that one under "future Thanks James, But i bet you can do it! Perserverance (spellin?) takes precedence (spelin?) over skill any day. I just get it set in my mind what I want, then, as Roger Miller sang, "knuckle down, buckle down, do it, do it, do it". AND it ALWAYS helps when the nay-sayers say it can't be done! hah I built an intake for my first inliner (49 Crosley) at age 16 out of some old steel bed rails, using only an acetylene torch and bench grinder. The flange surfaces were levelled with a large flat file. Ya make do with what ya got.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45127 - 11/13/08 08:13 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: jlgrooms]
|
Greybeard
Active BB Member
Registered: 01/27/06
Posts: 75
Loc: Sequim Washington
|
If you check the classifieds, there's a simple and much less pricy system there.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45946 - 12/10/08 05:57 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2323
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
i have a tubular turbo header that may fit your chassis. it mounts the turbo further forward. i need dimensions based from reference points on your engine and then we could tell if it would fit. tom
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45950 - 12/10/08 08:19 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2323
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
no, not by spa but another brazilian vendor. i also have other brazilian intakes and other parts i can get. if i have dimensions, then a header can be made in quantities. tom
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46106 - 12/16/08 06:22 AM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: 56er]
|
fingersix
Active BB Member
Registered: 07/14/03
Posts: 172
Loc: florida
|
Ive laid under the my 65 staring at the space between the tank and rear end too, for a remote mount,,, I'm looking for options,, here is some dims off an offy manifold manifold to tower 5 1/2" engine block to tower 9 1/2" bottom of manifold to cross member 12'
maybe the pic will help,,
http://s50.photobucket.com/albums/f320/fingersix/?action=view¤t=IMG_9778.jpg
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46144 - 12/17/08 11:17 AM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: CNC-Dude #5585]
|
fingersix
Active BB Member
Registered: 07/14/03
Posts: 172
Loc: florida
|
I cannot add the cog pulley to the front of the damper for the serpentine conversion, the fan paddles right in front of it,,I read that Paxton used to do v-belts, but they really don't support it now, I haven't found any first hand info if the v's slip terribly,,,to buy one used, I never even seen one w/v-grooves, To have a damper with the serpentine on it instead of v-grooves, is supposed to exist but I can't find them,,I thought of a sbc pulley from an early lt1 might work, something told me no, but I don't remember,, I think it was off the HAMB board,,
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46151 - 12/17/08 12:40 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Nexxussian]
|
fingersix
Active BB Member
Registered: 07/14/03
Posts: 172
Loc: florida
|
I've seen that,,there is even a few in the local yard, last time I was there,, I would try to go centrifical,, I even looked at vintage Mccollughs, but technology probally beats them hands down, I'll PM JG Loomis to see if he used an add on cog,,
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46180 - 12/18/08 05:47 AM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Nexxussian]
|
fingersix
Active BB Member
Registered: 07/14/03
Posts: 172
Loc: florida
|
Larry, can I borrow that t03 for fitting,, when I get the side cover back,,
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46242 - 12/22/08 11:31 AM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: fingersix]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2323
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
here are the pics of the tubular turbo header.



at the furthest point near turbo flange it sticks toward the drivers side 11". from the front header bolt to turbo flange is 9" or center between # 2,3 header tubes. the wastegate flange can easily be moved. tom
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46255 - 12/22/08 05:03 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Freds Garage]
|
elane352
Active BB Member
Registered: 09/23/03
Posts: 39
Loc: Bowie, MD, USA
|
Wow; just looking at some of the shots of what you all have done with your 6-cylinders rides makes me salivate.
I have been toying with the idea of fuel injection. I know that Clifford has a nice kit that I could use on my 57 chevy passenger car. But the price and the changes I would have to make have deterred me a bit.
I am using a Fenton intake (2 single barrel carbs) along with Fenton headers at this point (plus dual exhaust). I like the sound, but I would like a bit more uumph. Going with Clifford would require the kit, a Clifford intake, Clifford headers (I assume), and some slide mods to mate up the headers to the exhaust pipes.
What is the effort involved with the turbo options that you all have taken? How much of a hassle was it for you?
Let me know please. I am open to any and all thoughts. I am really curious.
Eddie
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46276 - 12/23/08 02:14 PM
Re: Rear Mounted Turbo STS
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
DougE
Active BB Member
Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 83
Loc: Springtown, TX
|
For the 292 in '38 Dodge that I was/may still be working on, I have a SPA turbo manifold I purchased from TLowe a couple of years ago. I had considered mounting the intake and exhaust manifolds inverted on the engine and mounting the turbo up high as for for that application, there exists much more room in the engine compartment up high than down low.
Obviously, this wouldn't work with a down-draft carb, but with either TBFI or MPFI, orientation of the air valve shouldn't matter much. It would get the turbo up away from the path of the steering shaft, and have an in-your-face appearance. Could it be that a similar thought would work for the ChevyII?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Webmaster
|
1 registered
(ccjowett)
and 42 anonymous users online.
|
|
|