#46277 - 12/23/08 02:39 PM
Siamese Intake Question...
|
DougE
Active BB Member
Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 83
Loc: Springtown, TX
|
I started on a 292 project which I was planning to turbocharge. I've bought a MegaSquirt for same, and was planning to use multiport fuel injection. Because I haven't found any intakes that meet my needs, I've pretty much resigned myself to fabricating my own intake.
My question is as follows: I've always wondered about constructing the siamese intake port with a full length splitter so that it becomes two individual ports on the manifold side. The port splitter would protrude from the intake, and be shaped to form with the head bolt boss and so provide a properly tapered and smoothed passage at least all the way past the boss.
Even though a 'window' to the other side of the inner port would exist, it seems like a satisfactory enough passage to create some ram effect would result. Has this been tried?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46287 - 12/23/08 05:38 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Turbo-6]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2327
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
doug, i have some intakes from brazil , that are made like you are describing. i will get some pics on wed and post them. they also have efi bungs installed.
i think if doing this, you need to take it all the way to the valve to kill the siamesed robbing effect. tom
turbo-6, glad to see you post on the brd again.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46309 - 12/24/08 01:21 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: big bill I.I.#4698]
|
russk
Active BB Member
Registered: 03/20/06
Posts: 75
Loc: Southern Oregon
|
Guys:
I'm probably off in "left field" on this but I'm wondering if all the port work (lumps and dividers, etc.) beyond some basic port 'n polish work is really so much of an issue with a turbocharged application? Is there a "ram effect" in play with a pressurized intake charge or does that only apply to naturally aspirated engines? Just curious . . .
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46338 - 12/25/08 05:29 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Beater of the Pack]
|
CNC-Dude #5585
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 09/27/08
Posts: 1735
Loc: N. Georgia
|
I agree with Beater, I think too much is being made from the siamese port issue. In a Flathead V-style engine with siamese exhaust ports, it has been shown and proven that dividing the ports helps dilution and reversion of neighboring cylinders that have firing sequences closer together in those type of engines(90 degree firing)! In the 6 cylinders, the firing is farther apart(120 degrees), and doesn't create the same dilution and reversion issues,even on adjoining cylinders! There have been many high horsepower siamese port engines built and raced,both N/A(over 600 HP) and Forced induction(over 1000 HP), that haven't had the ports divided. Not to say there might not be some gains to be achieved from dividing the ports. But as already has been said, you make the port window smaller, which will diminish the flow to some degree and possibly create other issues as well. Also, by design, the siamese port has a very poor short side radius, and adding a "lump" to even a stock engine, will yield a very noticable increase in performance. Like Beater said,a 12 port would be nice, but i've seen a "lump" siamese head flow over 330 CFM on the intake on quite a few heads.In comparison,I doubt a 12 port could obtain that because of their thin casting design.
_________________________
There's no such thing as too much cam....only not enough engine!
12 Port Head Manufacturer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46351 - 12/26/08 05:49 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Turbo-6]
|
DougE
Active BB Member
Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 83
Loc: Springtown, TX
|
Okay... Here is another brain-dead newbie question: Since it is possible to furnace-braze parts of heads together, as demonstrated by the small-block head conversions, would it be possible/desireable to saw three small blocks out of the head and and braze into place a new casting which includes longer radius port bends, individual ports, and more optimized port shapes?
For reliability and sealing, it might be better to mill out the top of the head and leave the head floor and valve seats, and just replace the ports and valve guides. It seems like such a replacement port casting would be relatively easy to develop as the casting would be open at the sides, and so not need elaborate self-supporting cores. Obviously, the new port walls could be left somewhat thicker to allow for porting without hitting the water jacket.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46354 - 12/26/08 08:11 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: DougE]
|
$UM FUN
Active BB Member
Registered: 03/03/07
Posts: 92
Loc: Nor Cal
|
Okay... Here is another brain-dead newbie question: Since it is possible to furnace-braze parts of heads together, as demonstrated by the small-block head conversions, would it be possible/desireable to saw three small blocks out of the head and and braze into place a new casting which includes longer radius port bends, individual ports, and more optimized port shapes?
Its not a brain dead question. Its been done before. I have some pictures, if I can find them I will post it. But from talking to the guy it was a lot of welding. A LOT OF WELDING!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46356 - 12/26/08 08:52 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: DougE]
|
CNC-Dude #5585
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 09/27/08
Posts: 1735
Loc: N. Georgia
|
Okay... Here is another brain-dead newbie question: Since it is possible to furnace-braze parts of heads together, as demonstrated by the small-block head conversions, would it be possible/desireable to saw three small blocks out of the head and and braze into place a new casting which includes longer radius port bends, individual ports, and more optimized port shapes?
For reliability and sealing, it might be better to mill out the top of the head and leave the head floor and valve seats, and just replace the ports and valve guides. It seems like such a replacement port casting would be relatively easy to develop as the casting would be open at the sides, and so not need elaborate self-supporting cores. Obviously, the new port walls could be left somewhat thicker to allow for porting without hitting the water jacket. It would be much easier to take sections from several different aluminum heads and just Tig(heliarc) them, than trying to furnace braze cast iron heads, and probably a lot cheaper. Thats what Leo did with his engines, and seems to have had good results from those heads instead of cast iron....plus, I dont think there are any cast iron heads that would provide that much of an improvement over a professionally ported siamese head with "lumps". I've done many "lump" siamese heads that had the intake ports flow over 330 CFM, its doubtful that even the best Dart or World Products cast iron head could even be made to flow close to 300 CFM. Very few aluminum heads can even do it either. Very few people have ever had a really good "lump" head to truly know and see their potential.
_________________________
There's no such thing as too much cam....only not enough engine!
12 Port Head Manufacturer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46366 - 12/26/08 08:50 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: CNC-Dude #5585]
|
Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank
Active BB Member
 
Registered: 09/23/04
Posts: 4546
Loc: Ca
|
[quote=DougE]I've done many "lump" siamese heads that had the intake ports flow over 330 CFM
OK, Larry,,,,,Twisted6,,,,what are we not doing????? Besides breaking into water jackets & a lot of welding & epoxies?
MBHD
_________________________
12 port SDS EFI
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46367 - 12/26/08 09:56 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
$UM FUN
Active BB Member
Registered: 03/03/07
Posts: 92
Loc: Nor Cal
|
I have seen one on a flow bench that did 320 with lumps. But the port was also raised 1/2" on the roof and the floor was also raised 1/2". The intake seat also had a parabolic cut instead of a 5 or 7 angle job. Lots of welding and work.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46375 - 12/27/08 12:47 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Beater of the Pack]
|
Hoyt
Active BB Member
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 362
Loc: St. Louis, MO
|
Didn't one of the Wayne heads employ different timing? Did I read that in the Twelve Port Story?
All of the "Wayne" 12-port heads made for the Chevy 216-235-261 engines by Wayne Horning, Harry Warner, Bob Toros, and the recent Wayne MFG. Co. had the the same valve arrangement as the the stock engines. The 12-port head that Wayne Horning made for the GMC after he and Harry Warner separated did have a different valve arrangement (I-E-I-E-I-E-E-I-E-I-E-I) in an attempt to eliminate hot spots. This, of course, requires a custom camshaft. I believe that this is explained in Part 2 of the 12-Port story in the "Historical' link and in the April 1951 HRM. Pat Swanson also described the various Chevy and GMC 12-port heads at the Denver convention in 2006. Several members brought in examples of most of the heads for "show and tell."
_________________________
Hoyt, Inliner #922
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46388 - 12/28/08 07:36 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Turbo-6]
|
292C10
Active BB Member
Registered: 05/05/02
Posts: 78
Loc: Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
I've been off the board for a long time, but this post caught my interest. Back in 2002 I tried port EFI on a stock 250 (no turbocharging). Made a custom manifold to hold the injectors, etc. Sure it ran, but there were always dead spots in the range where it would falter. Examination of the exhaust ports and manifold, plus the plugs led to the conclusion that #1 and #6 were running lean. At the time I wasn't thinking about valve timing, but more intake manifold geometry and was it ramming more air in to 1 and 6...
Anyway, to try something different I went to a TBI on a 4-bbl Offy manifold and that cleaned it right up!
This always puzzled me, and a few years back I found this link: http://www.starchak.ca/efi/siamese.htm which explains why the whole problem of charge robbing occurs. Makes so much sense when you look at it, and I wish I'd found this back in 2002.
So, given this reality, I think the only options (untried by me) are the "port divider" proposed above, or perhaps the clifford manifold for the three side-draught webers. I wanted to try three small TBIs, mounted on their sides and flowing directly to the head. At the least, this should provide a few even air/fuel distribution, because the geometry of each siamese pair will be identical.
Greg
_________________________
1977 Chevy C10 SWB EFI 292 SM465
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46393 - 12/28/08 05:02 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Beater of the Pack]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2327
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
greg, here are a few pics of a intake from brazil. it is split right up to the carb hole. i also have a clifford type intake from them that is split the same way, with injector bungs.


 tom
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46396 - 12/28/08 07:44 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2327
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
hank, the two you listed from ebay do not split the siamese intake runners as we have been discussing.
the runners on the black intake i supplied pics for are in total alittle smaller than a clifford port. i think with head port dividers and a turbo, this would be a kickin intake. tom
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46397 - 12/28/08 07:56 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: tlowe #1716]
|
Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank
Active BB Member
 
Registered: 09/23/04
Posts: 4546
Loc: Ca
|
Tom , the intake pic you posted looks sorta like the PES manifold in Leo's book on pg 114.
I know it's not split & it is not a flat design,it rasies the carb up high.
But just a note from Leo's book on the PES manifold. Strickly competition use. The PES runners appear to be much smaller than the one you showed.
I am not sure how that manifold you have pictured in this thread,would give you any low end or mid range power,even with the deviders,volume appears to be way too big to be practicle.
I devided my Clifferd intake manifold,it helped,but I made more practicle street power w/my Offy intake manifold.
Sure, w/a turbo it will make top end power,but on the street,it will cause the turbo to spool slow. Just my two cents thrown. I do not know for sure,but that manifold looks like a hardcore race only unit.
Guys in Brazil do not seem to be using it,@ least I have not seen it on any of the fast cars or street cars.
Is the manifold fresh off the press? Just introduced to the market? Do you have any info on that manifold from the manufacture?
MBHD
_________________________
12 port SDS EFI
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46400 - 12/29/08 12:22 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
bobbristow
Bulletin Board Only Member
Registered: 12/07/08
Posts: 4
Loc: SC
|
I'm a new guy here. Just been reading and trying to learn. I'll have to say this is a very informative site. Tom, can you post pics of the intake with the injector bungs?
Bob
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46401 - 12/29/08 12:27 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: bobbristow]
|
bobbristow
Bulletin Board Only Member
Registered: 12/07/08
Posts: 4
Loc: SC
|
Tom,
On closer inspection, it seems you already did, if I'm seeing things right. What about the Clifford type. Is that a 4 barrel type or the Weber type with FI bungs?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46415 - 12/29/08 03:54 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: bobbristow]
|
DougE
Active BB Member
Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 83
Loc: Springtown, TX
|
I went back and searched TLowe's split port post; Tom fabricated siamese port splitters much along the lines that I was considering after rejecting the notion of splitting the port only up the head bolt boss.
Version 2.0... I'm now thinking of removing the head bolt boss as is done for the lump port. The vertical port splitter can be formed around a new head bolt boss tube which is inserted in the opening where the original boss was located. When the splitter is properly located in the port, the head bolt hole and the splitter can be overbored and a steel sleeve pressed in to secure all parts. I'm sure that an appropriate epoxy would be needed to seal the waterjacket.
Like Tom's splitters, I don't think that an airtight division between the halves of the ports is critical; just trying to get the bulk of the airflow and the injected fuel into the correct opening.
The big advantage that I can envision for this approach is that curved horizontal blades could attached to the convenient splitter to serve as turning vanes. Very often in both aerospace and in powerplant airflow applications, turning vanes can make a short radius turn act equivalently to a much longer radius turn. Could this provide the benefit of a lump port without reducing the port runner volume as much?
Welded-in turning vanes would also seem to provide increased resistance to vibration/metal fatigue of the splitter tongue.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46427 - 12/29/08 07:03 PM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
tlowe #1716
12 PORT ADVERTISER
Active BB Member
  
Registered: 04/01/04
Posts: 2327
Loc: Dysart, Iowa
|
bobbristow, here are pics of the clifford type intake with fuel rails and divided runners.



anyone interested in them please PM me.
hank, the 1st intake(black) has smaller runners than a clifford. i think it would be a good low/midrange intake. tom
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46449 - 12/30/08 07:28 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: Mean buzzen half dozen A.K.A. Hank]
|
bobbristow
Bulletin Board Only Member
Registered: 12/07/08
Posts: 4
Loc: SC
|
Thanks, Tom
Bob
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46451 - 12/30/08 10:14 AM
Re: Siamese Intake Question...
[Re: bobbristow]
|
DougE
Active BB Member
Registered: 12/15/08
Posts: 83
Loc: Springtown, TX
|
A question for TLowe...
The "Brazilian" intake pictured above in black appears to be regular production. Does that imply that there are regular production heads (or modification kits) that are designed to work with the split intake?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Webmaster
|
|