logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#46661 01/07/09 09:01 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 154
T
trump Offline OP
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
T
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 154
I'm thinking about picking up a '51 Desoto project. Don't know much about them and I typically stay away from Mopar like the plague. This car is cheap and relatively complete and solid, so it's hard to pass up.

I am completely ignorant to the chrysler 6's. Would this car share the same motor as a dodge/plymouth of the same year or are they all different? Are there any hop-up parts out there for them?

This one has a flat 6 in it that hasn't run since '68, but my buddy has a '52 Plymouth flat 6 that's a runner. Would it be a drop in?

Any info anybody could shed on the topic would be great. Any web resources would be good too. Thanks.

Last edited by trump; 01/07/09 09:02 PM.

'40 Studebaker project Chevy 292 powered.
'51 Chevy business coupe 216ci inliner
Inliner's #5360
trump #46666 01/07/09 11:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 47
1000 Post Club
****
Offline
1000 Post Club
****
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 47
Trump, I am going to post a link to a forum i was reading last night. If you go there I am sure you will get the DeSoto. I'll start a new thread and hopefully it will shed light on these great engines. It's bigger that a Plymouth. Tom


"I wonder if God created man because he was disappointed in the monkey?" Mark Twain
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 154
T
trump Offline OP
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
T
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 154
I read the whole thread. Didn't have a chance to check out the other links yet.

So I guess that what the consensus is is that the motors are for crap to do anything with performance, but they are reliable and last a long time.

My biggest question is about after market parts and if there are any available.

I bought the DeSoto, so now I got to get it running or chuck the drive train and stuff my already built Chevy 250 in there.

I'll try to get the original motor running first though.


'40 Studebaker project Chevy 292 powered.
'51 Chevy business coupe 216ci inliner
Inliner's #5360
trump #46697 01/08/09 04:23 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 154
T
trump Offline OP
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
T
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 154
Well, nevermind. I had to bail on it. Had a friend go to pay for it and pick it up and he said that it was grossly misrepresented. Said the rockers were non-existant, he could push his thumb through most of the sheet metal if he tried, radiator/fender support was rusted away from the fenders, no metal under the headlights. No floor in the rear. So we declined.

Guess the search is still on for a super cheap project. I keep telling myself it's the thrill of the hunt.


'40 Studebaker project Chevy 292 powered.
'51 Chevy business coupe 216ci inliner
Inliner's #5360
trump #46711 01/09/09 12:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 47
1000 Post Club
****
Offline
1000 Post Club
****
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 47
That is too bad! It could have been a fun driver. In your search don't over look some of the older Studebaker inlines, all the Mopars, and the big GMs.


"I wonder if God created man because he was disappointed in the monkey?" Mark Twain
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,613
G
1000 Post Club
Offline
1000 Post Club
G
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,613
The 49-54 Mopars are generally inexpensive, but that's because most people aren't interested in them. The styling isn't on par with the others of the time. If you are going to buy one, note that the brakes and front suspension are very expensive to rebuild by comparison to a Ford or Chevy. Research what availability and parts costs are for some of these cars before you go buying anything. Spending a little more up front may save you alot later on. Just my opinion...


I.I. #3174
gearhead #47096 01/20/09 11:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Did Blueskies sell his '50?


Martin
'64 Nova wagon
'69 C10
strummin67 I.I. #47132 01/21/09 03:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
 Originally Posted By: strummin67 I.I.
Did Blueskies sell his '50?


Nope... but I think I'm going to hang on to it for now.

Pete

blueskies #48064 02/22/09 06:22 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 599
R
Major Contributor
*****
Offline
Major Contributor
*****
R
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 599
You couldn't part with it, could you?

I personally feel that a De Soto is a class act of that era. They had some advanced features, being Chrysler's 'test the market' line, things like the fluid drive attached to their standard gearbox.

And they look different to the more common Dodges and Plymouths.

Great engine, as blueskies will attest, though a De Soto is more likely a big block than a 218 as fitted to most Plymouths.

I can't see why the front end would be so expensive, either. But I do admit to not having personal experience with it.

Ray Bell #48080 02/23/09 05:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
 Originally Posted By: Ray Bell
You couldn't part with it, could you?


No, not yet anyway... time will tell.

Pete

Ray Bell #48093 02/24/09 03:11 AM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,613
G
1000 Post Club
Offline
1000 Post Club
G
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,613
 Originally Posted By: Ray Bell

I can't see why the front end would be so expensive, either. But I do admit to not having personal experience with it.



A friend of mine rebuilt the frontend on a '50 chrysler about 2 years ago. that's what I'm basing my statement on.
Just look up the parts sometime. They use a dual wheel cylinder arrangement and you need to send the shoes in to get relined.


I.I. #3174
gearhead #48094 02/24/09 03:45 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 599
R
Major Contributor
*****
Offline
Major Contributor
*****
R
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 599
Yes, that's the front brakes... which I would recommend replacing anyway...

What about the front end? The suspension bits?

Ray Bell #48098 02/24/09 11:43 AM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,613
G
1000 Post Club
Offline
1000 Post Club
G
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,613
I just looked at Kanter, not necessarily the best or cheapest, but I know they sell things in "kit form" so it's easy for comparison. You could probably piece it together for less, but I'm not going to spend my time on it. I'll leave that up to you...

http://www.kanter.com///productdetail.as...&Cat=39&Prc=181

http://www.kanter.com///productdetail.as...=0&Cat=7&Prc=36


I.I. #3174
gearhead #48101 02/24/09 04:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
 Originally Posted By: gearhead
 Originally Posted By: Ray Bell

I can't see why the front end would be so expensive, either. But I do admit to not having personal experience with it.



A friend of mine rebuilt the frontend on a '50 chrysler about 2 years ago. that's what I'm basing my statement on.
Just look up the parts sometime. They use a dual wheel cylinder arrangement and you need to send the shoes in to get relined.


Here's a list of what I spent on my '50 Plymouth brakes and front end rebuild kit, all from Kanter. Hit reload on your browser if the image doesn't show up...



This adds up to just about $500 for completely new brakes stem to stern. These prices were a few years ago. The brake shoes are available (at least for Plymouth) with a core charge for your old shoes.

If I had to do it all over again, I would replace the front brakes and master cylinder with a disc conversion and dual master cylinder setup, for about the same money. I had already purchased all the replacement stuff before anyone had a disc conversion kit for sale for my car, back in 2000. A year or two later, the kits started to appear on the market.

The front suspension isn't bad for the era. It is a dual A-arm setup, but the arms are un-equal length unlike modern setups. The ride is nice, and handles fine for a daily driver. I had my alignment done after rebuilding the front end, the alignment shop was amazed at how easy it was to set up the alignment. They thought it was great that a 59 year old car had such a well thought out suspension.

With drop spindles, shock relocation kits, and disc conversions, I see no reason to do an MII swap or clip one of these cars.

Pete

Last edited by blueskies; 02/24/09 04:18 PM.
blueskies #49686 05/02/09 08:54 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 63
T
Active BB Member
Offline
Active BB Member
T
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 63
I have a '47 DeSoto S11 coupe with the 236. I like
the early '50s DeSoto station wagons, but there is
not much interest in these cars, even with a hemi
motor. I like the honest styling, this is the era
of the first hardtops. I think these car are less
rust prone than the tail fin era Mopars.

Tim Keith #49711 05/04/09 09:19 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
B
Major Contributor
***
Offline
Major Contributor
***
B
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 596
Blue skies
I have a 1941 plymouth and I rebuilt the stock front end then added 11' disk brakes and changed the front shock mounting points which made a fine front end but I then removed the stock sway bar and adapted a front sway bar off of a middle 80s chevy police cruiser and you would not believe the difference in the handeling, it now thinks it is a small sports roadster instead of a big top heavy sedan.


Been there, Done that, Hope to live long enough to do it again.
Big Bill
I.I.# 4698
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 3
P
1000 Post Club
**
Offline
1000 Post Club
**
P
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 3
the arms are un-equal length unlike modern setups?

Name one.


Moderated by  stock49, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 445 guests, and 37 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
castironphil, uncle dave, trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony
6,785 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5