logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 18
G
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
G
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 18
For instance the carby on my '72 292 looks very origional and basic. I also have a fresh "reman" (application unknown) with an electric choke which looks a bit more "smogged with at least two or three vacuum ports that I would have to plug if I were to use it. Hell maybe it won't work that way.
Does anyone see why the fancier reman won't work on my C20 pickup?
BTW This '72 pickup is a beater that I bought for moving but it happens to have a especially nice running engine. My plan is to use the engine to resurrect a '58 chev apache pickup street rod that I haven't used in years. It will have a 2004r. It has a '73 nova front end grafted to it. So the '72 is just a test bench of sorts for now.
You can see the '58 in the "Truck Talk" forum.

Last edited by gungadin; 04/20/10 12:41 AM.
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
D
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
D
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
Good post here. If you measure venturi and throttle it is easy to tell which one you have. I like the old Rochester B/BC/BV better than the MV carbs but hey if it runs good, run it!


https://www.inliners.org/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=45962

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 18
G
Active BB Member
OP Offline
Active BB Member
G
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 18
Well I guess I should have googled but I found this on a camaro website....

# The 1967 six-cylinder engines without A.I.R. (Air Injection Reactor, aka smog) were supplied with Rochester 1BV one-barrel carburetors. The exact CFM rating of the 1BV is unknown, but it was approximately 250 CFM.

# 1968 and 1969 six-cylinder engines (the standard 230ci/140hp and the optional 250ci/155hp), received the Rochester "Monojet" (1MV) one-barrel carburetors. Rated at 250 CFM, this was enough to supply ample power to the car while still achieving good gas mileage.


Deucecoupe,, So monojet on a 292?? That sort of explodes those cfm "formulas" like 2xcu"=cfm +/- (that begs for two of em!)
It's so much velocity! Maybe this speaks to the iceing you mentioned in the other thread.
Like you said tho: The proof is in the puddin'. So we'll see!!

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 3
P
1000 Post Club
**
Offline
1000 Post Club
**
P
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 3
If the vacuum at WOT is higher than 3.0" Hg, the CFM goes up.
That formula (although questionable under many circumstances) is for maximum size, nothing else.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 493
P
Contributor
****
Offline
Contributor
****
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 493
 Quote:
# 1968 and 1969 six-cylinder engines (the standard 230ci/140hp and the optional 250ci/155hp), received the Rochester "Monojet" (1MV) one-barrel carburetors. Rated at 250 CFM, this was enough to supply ample power to the car while still achieving good gas mileage.


According to doug roe's rochester book 1973 printing (@ 3.0in. hg.pressure drop)
1-7/16" throttle bore with 1-7/32" venturi is 160 cfm
1-11/16" throttle bore with 1-5/16" venturi is 210 cfm
1-11/16" throttle bore with 1-1/2" venturi is 250 cfm

many people dont like the mono, but once you desmog 'em they are good - and they dont have the nasal part throttle "whistle' that the model Bs have


Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (stock49), 296 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony, KeithB, Steve83
6,783 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5