logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1
S
SASS Offline OP
Newcomer
OP Offline
Newcomer
S
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1
I am in the process of rebuilding a 1959 Chevy 235 for my tuck and after taking the rocker arm assembly off I found that one half of the rocker arm shaft had been broken in two where it passes through the support post. My best guess is that whoever worked on the engine last did not tighten the bolts evenly as they put it back together and just left it or did not notice.

I have a possible complete parts engine lined up (58 or 59 from what I can ascertain) but my question is this; what years are the rocker arm shafts for Chevy 235's compatible. I have not been able to find out what years the oiling passages are the same; also I have heard that the shafts vary in diameter slightly between certain years? If that is the case can i just bolt the entire assembly on instead?

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 239
R
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
R
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 239
Yes you can bolt the entire assembly on. Any 55 or later rocker arm assy. Will work on your truck.


inliner # 3850
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 471
Likes: 9
M
Contributor
****
Offline
Contributor
****
M
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 471
Likes: 9
here is what I know about the rocker arms. Keep in mind that the idea is to dribble/trickle oil out of the spit hole of each rocker to cool the springs and lube the shaft, ball, push rod and lifter seat. 55-57 rocker arms are different then the 59 and up rockers. The way you can tell the difference is to look inside the rocker. You should see a grove inside the rocker that intersects with the spit hole on a 55-57 style rocker. Not sure about 58, might be the same. In 59, Chevy changed the oiling system to create a sort of pressurized system. Oil feeds up through a passage in the block to the head in the 59 and up, through a larger orifice, into the rocker connector and into the rocker shart, instead of pulling oil pressure off the rear cam bearing and feeding it to the rockers through a steel line under the tappet cover on the 55-57 version. Also, instead of the open loop arrangement in the rocker connector on the 55-57, the loop is pinched off (of course every one pinched off the loop on a 55-57 just to try to get more oil to the rockers in the 55-57 when the motors got a little mileage on them and the flow dropped a little from wear and tear and clogged steel line) All of this was intended to create a little pressurized system in the 59 and up motors. so if you look into the bore of a 59 and up rocker arm, you will see that the grove does not directly intersect the spit hole but is offset. The now pressurized (so to speak) oil moves through the clearance between the rocker arm bore and rocker arm shaft and then gets to the spit hole. So if you use 55-57 rockers on a later 59 and up motor, you may end up with to much oil spitting out of the rockers, and not enough dribbling onto the springs, and rockers, balls and push rod. So if possible, you would want to use the correct style arm for the motor. As for the shafts, I am pretty sure they are the same size dimensionally for 55-63. That being said, I am not so sure you can just swap new shafts onto old rockers as I am sure there is some dimension between the shaft and the bore of the arm that must or should be kept to allow the system to work correctly. Just my understanding.


Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 314 guests, and 51 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony, KeithB, Steve83
6,783 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5