logo
12 Port News - Features
12 Port History
Casting Numbers
Online Store
Tech Tips
Become a Member
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#88004 12/07/15 03:05 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 335
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 335
Ian67's thread spins off a great subject. What octane fuel is appropriate for these modified engines (but not blown/injected)? Is it as simple as a table that has compression ratios with 87, 89, 93 for US fuel? How much does the CAM have to do with it?

thanks!


Mark
'67 Camaro L6-250
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 378
7
Contributor
****
Offline
Contributor
****
7
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 378
The cam has everything to do with it. The cam decides how much compression pressure remains in the chamber when the fuel mixture is ignited. Compression pressure for a given engine with unique build details is what dictates what octane you need to run.
There are lots of variables, making it impossible to say what octane you need to run for which cam and (static) compression ratio. You can get pretty useful ballpark figures, but the bottom line is, run as LOW octane as your engine can work reliably with, without detonating etc. Too high octane is not really "bad" for the engine per se, just a waste of money. Higher octane also doesn't burn/ignite as easily (Duhh, that's it's main design feature).

Even altitude makes a difference. Shape of combustion chambers, piston tops, deck height......

If you are not sure, start with the highest octane pump gas you can get, see how it runs. If no problems, go down to mid grade and see what happens. Any detonation, pinging, dieseling, stumbling on acceleration etc.... go back to high octane and see if those symptoms disappear. If mid grade behaved well, try the local dish water (lowest octane). See above diagnosis, repeat.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
S
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
Agree.

I will add that when you do get some spark knock this can be used as a tuning aid to help you dial in ignition lead.

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
G
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
G
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
Just as an aside: That was one of the clues about my wiped cam. I had to go with premium gas because regular started causing a knock. The #6 exhaust cam was shot. Probably got a TON of compression in that cylinder.

Just one of many little things that should have clued me in earlier about the cam.

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
1000 Post Club
*****
Offline
1000 Post Club
*****
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
I'm having a hard time connecting a bad cam and a TON of compression. Why would more compression cause a wiped lobe? Doesn't the exhaust lobe start to open the valve when the piston is near BDC, when cylinder pressure has fallen off significantly from its peak?


FORD 300 inline six - THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN DRAG RACING!
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
G
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
G
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
Originally Posted By: THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
I'm having a hard time connecting a bad cam and a TON of compression. Why would more compression cause a wiped lobe? Doesn't the exhaust lobe start to open the valve when the piston is near BDC, when cylinder pressure has fallen off significantly from its peak?


The exhaust valve never really opened up. Compression built up with each stroke compounding it upon what was already in there.

Nix that. I couldn't have pulled in more than atmosphere during intake.

regardless it pinged like crazy until I changed the cam or went with a higher octane.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
S
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
Intake closing too early from worn intake cam lobe will trap more fresh mixture at slow speeds, potentially causing spark knock. This may be what gbauer observed.

I don't know the stock cam specs but intake closing for a stock cam might be 20 or 30 degrees after BDC on compression stroke. A worn cam lobe and/or mis adjusted rockers could move this figure closer to BDC and trap more charge.

Intake closing point has more effect on how the engine runs than any other valve event.

Yes, the exhaust lobe was the worst but I'll bet the other lobes were worn too.

Last edited by strokersix; 12/07/15 05:59 PM.
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
G
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
G
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
They were all pretty shot. I'm actually surprised it ran as well as it did! Guess this noob isn't so bad when it comes to tuning up an old car...

I figure if I could make her run that well I can really make it run well now.

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 376
T
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 376
anything above 10.0.1 you'll want to run 92. Even at 9.5.1 I'd be running 92.


1966 C10 292/tko600 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=596643
1964 C20 292/sm420
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 335
Contributor
OP Offline
Contributor
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 335
Originally Posted By: TJ's Chevy
anything above 10.0.1 you'll want to run 92. Even at 9.5.1 I'd be running 92.


I'd been running premium in the ill conceived notion that it has less ethanol. But everything except gas tank gaskets upgraded, so it's not an issue anymore.

I'll have about 9.25:1 with the flat tops, so barring trial and error differencs, it sounds like mid grade minimum, maybe premium. The guys who wok with the old Chevy engines keep on the virtue of stock. Regular gas is one reason. But to them i say MORE POWER! :-)

But the more aggressive CAM (same as gbauer) will affect it too, but don't understand affect yet.

Thanks,
Mark


Mark
'67 Camaro L6-250
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,556
Likes: 35
1000 Post Club
****
Offline
1000 Post Club
****
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,556
Likes: 35
There are many things to consider for knock sensitivity.
Static compression
Cam
Ignition timing
Quench
To name a few.
My 65 wagon does not rattle. I have burned premium but mostly use midgrade. Have burned 87 with no ill rattles. Has 214 degrees duration and 9.5 compression. And a talled rear geared stick shift. Less duration and it would be a rattler.


Inliner Member 1716
65 Chevelle Wagon and 41 Hudson Pickup
Information and parts www.12bolt.com

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 376
T
Contributor
Offline
Contributor
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 376
Originally Posted By: mshaw230
Originally Posted By: TJ's Chevy
anything above 10.0.1 you'll want to run 92. Even at 9.5.1 I'd be running 92.


I'd been running premium in the ill conceived notion that it has less ethanol. But everything except gas tank gaskets upgraded, so it's not an issue anymore.

I'll have about 9.25:1 with the flat tops, so barring trial and error differencs, it sounds like mid grade minimum, maybe premium. The guys who wok with the old Chevy engines keep on the virtue of stock. Regular gas is one reason. But to them i say MORE POWER! :-)

But the more aggressive CAM (same as gbauer) will affect it too, but don't understand affect yet.

Thanks,
Mark

89 would be OK, but I even run premium most of the time in my 305 V6 which has 7.5.1 compression. lol Even though 87 would be fine for it. Course I don't know your gas prices where you are. Premium is just over 3 bucks a gallon here.


1966 C10 292/tko600 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=596643
1964 C20 292/sm420
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
S
Contributor
*****
Offline
Contributor
*****
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 493
For a reference point, my stroked 250 (296 inch displacement) is about 9.5:1 static CR. Nice tight squish/quench about 0.030 inch clearance. Camshaft is a too short Comp 252 at about 205 duration. I run 87 octane no ethanol. It will rattle if I intentionally lug it down but most driving it is fine.

I need a longer duration cam. The engine is out now for just that.

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
G
Major Contributor
Offline
Major Contributor
G
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 821
Originally Posted By: mshaw230
Originally Posted By: TJ's Chevy
anything above 10.0.1 you'll want to run 92. Even at 9.5.1 I'd be running 92.


I'd been running premium in the ill conceived notion that it has less ethanol. But everything except gas tank gaskets upgraded, so it's not an issue anymore.

I'll have about 9.25:1 with the flat tops, so barring trial and error differencs, it sounds like mid grade minimum, maybe premium. The guys who wok with the old Chevy engines keep on the virtue of stock. Regular gas is one reason. But to them i say MORE POWER! :-)

But the more aggressive CAM (same as gbauer) will affect it too, but don't understand affect yet.

Thanks,
Mark


I have stock compression and have no pinging at all with my cam running 87.

You're not all that much higher than me so you might be on that edge where you can sneak by on 87.


Moderated by  stock49, Twisted6, will6er 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 368 guests, and 43 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
castironphil, uncle dave, trustedmedications20, Jsmay101, Paul Mahony
6,785 Registered Users
Sponsored Advertisement
Sponsored Advertisement
This Space is Available
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5