Hank,
Have not used a stub stack on this engine yet, did on the 292. Will with the bigger cams.

The Clifford had 4 lbs more tq @ 2500 rpm and 19 more @ 5600 rpm.
How is that not more usable on the street? This is a real world test. Another thing, the engine was more efficient with fuel. Also shown in the BSFC #'s. The tq is there...


You also say people should try both intakes and decide. I agree. Who can afford to have both? That is why the dyno testing is taking place. To put #'s with modifications done, to be logical with parts used, and dispell long held misconceptions about building these engines for the street.

A 280 HP 255 inline 6 is no slouch, especially with a modest cam and a reasonable build. With the next head 10-15Hp will be welcome. Got my fingers crossed. Tom

Last edited by tlowe #1716; 04/04/10 01:06 AM.

Inliner Member 1716
65 Chevelle Wagon and 41 Hudson Pickup
Information and parts www.12bolt.com